Legal Opinion
Barnhill v. Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 25, 1992No. 91-159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
503 U.S. 393 (1992)
BARNHILL
v.
JOHNSON, TRUSTEE
No. 91-159.
United States Supreme Court.
Argued January 14, 1992.
Decided March 25, 1992.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Blackmun, J., joined, post, p. 403.
William J. Arland III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Emily A. Franke.
Nancy S. Cusack argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were William…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Batlan v. Bledsoe (In Re Bledsoe)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009