Legal Opinion

Village of Bradford v. Cameron

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1906No. 1,501PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit upon certain bonds and coupons thereon, issued by the village of Bradford, Ohio, under and by virtue of the provisions of section 2701, Rev. St. 1892, of Ohio, in pursuance of an ordinance passed May 18, 1901, for the purpose of extending the time of payment of certain indebtedness, made upon a corporation building and electric light plant. The petition, in addition to stating the facts respecting the issue of the bonds, which after legal publication were sold to the highest bidder, and are now held by bona fide purchasers in the open market, set forth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Defiance v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. In re Woodside Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Clapp v. Village of Marice CityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  4. Kinney v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Ironton v. Harrison Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Malibu Behavioral Health Services Inc. v. Magellan Healthcare, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
  3. Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API