Legal Opinion

United States v. Monteiro

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 5, 2006No. 05-2283PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Acting on Amando Monteiro’s pretrial motion, the district court suppressed from evidence two guns the police obtained during a vehicle stop. The government sought our review pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1371, which authorizes interlocutory appeals in situations such as this. We affirm.

I

In an appeal from a suppression order, the district court’s findings of fact govern absent a showing of clear error. Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996). Neither party suggests that the district court made such an error, so we recite the facts as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Harold CastleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. RuidiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API