Legal Opinion

Miller v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 4, 1983No. 83-714Published

1Per curiam

The deceased’s father was employed by Pitney Bowes, Inc. Pitney leased from their employees their automobiles for use in its business activities and agreed to provide insurance for its employees during the term of such lease. The employee’s son was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist. An action was then brought against Pitney, the employer, and Liberty Mutual, the insurer. In an amended complaint the following is found.

“14. At the time the subject lease was entered into, the defendant PITNEY BOWES fully informed the defendant LIBERTY of the fact that said leased vehicles of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hopke v. O'BYRNEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Crompton v. KirklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. Dreka v. WhitehairSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API