State v. King
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.
The defendant was convicted by a jury in the Superior Court (McHugh, J.) of first degree assault, ESA 631:1. On ap*675peal the defendant contends that the trial court’s supplemental charge invaded the province of the jury in violation of his constitutional right to due process. We reverse.
The indictment alleged that the defendant “knowingly caused bodily injury, that is, a puncture wound to the chest and numerous lacerations to the hands and body of [the victim], by knowingly striking and stabbing her with a knife, a deadly weapon.” Testimony at trial from the victim and two eyewitnesses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. BirdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Poulin v. ProvostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. JudkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McMinnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- State v. GribbleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- State v. TownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.