Tennant v. Pfister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, County of Santa Clara. The defendants had judgment in an action to recover the value of the use of certain land, and the plaintiffs appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
The defendants demurred to the complaint for an alleged misjoinder of parties plaintiff; and the demurrer having been overruled, and an order to that effect entered of record, they subsequently filed an answer, denying the allegations of the complaint, and setting up matter in bar of the action. The action afterwards came on to be tried upon the issues joined by the answer, whereupon the defendants objected to the evidence offered by the plaintiff, the ground of the objection being that which had been taken by the demurrer, to wit: the alleged misjoinder of parties plaintiff.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Wells v. ApplegateOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Sams Automatic Car Coupler Co. v. LeagueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- Tennant v. PfisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.