Legal Opinion

Timblin v. Harris

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-1693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF COURT

ZIEGLER, District Judge.

This court is required to determine whether the findings of fact by the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare are supported by substantial evidence. We hold that William H. Timblin is disabled within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 423(d) (1976) and the decision of the Secretary, which terminates disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments, must be reversed.

The facts and legal issues are set forth in the well-written opinion of the Administrative Law Judge and need not be repeated at length.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Concetta Rossi v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Trujillo v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  3. Graham v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1983
  4. Musgrove v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Turner v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API