Legal Opinion

Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co. v. Plymer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 8, 1903No. 43PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

Writ of error by defendant from judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in the court below on a verdict for $9,098.22, for commission on sale of the Hartford, one of defendant’s vessels. A motion for a new trial was denied. Error is assigned because of the refusal of the court below to direct a verdict in favor of defendant on the ground that there was no evidence to show that defendant authorized plaintiff to act as its broker in procuring said sale.

Plaintiff is a steamboat broker in the city of New York. Defendant is a Connecticut corporation, located in Hartford,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Mott v. . Consumers' Ice CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API