In re Moragne
Idaho Supreme Court
Original proceeding for writ of habeas corpus. The facts being fully set forth in the opinion, the following authorities are cited: Idaho Rev. Stats., secs. 7666, 7667, 8212,-8213; 4 Deering’s Code, secs. 940, 942, 1382, 1383; Idaho Const., art. 1, sec. 8; Ex parte Bull, 42 Cal. 196; Ex parte Ciarle, 54 Cal. 412; 1 Bishop’s New Criminal Procedure, see. 870. No brief filed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuarles, J.
— The petitioner, after notice to th’e attorney general, made application for a writ of habeas corpus. The *83matter was fully argued by James W. Keid, for the petitioner, and by the attorney general in opposition. After duly considering the matter, the writ was ordered issued, which was done. To the writ the sheriff has made his return. From the petition and exhibits thereto attached, and the return to the writ, it appears that the petitioner was arrested upon a warrant which issued upon a complaint verified by one L. L. Strang, charging petitioner with the crime of murder, committed in Nez…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Carracciolo v. Corte de Distrito de GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- Carracciolo v. District Court of GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937