Legal Opinion

Lane v. FLORIDA PROBATION COM'N

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 2005No. 1D04-2654PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

894 So.2d 1087 (2005)

Rayfield LANE, Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D04-2654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 2005.

Rayfield Lane, pro se, petitioner.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.

2Per curiam

Because the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed below set forth a prima facie basis for relief, the circuit court erred in summarily denying the petition without issuing an order to show cause. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.630(d). Accordingly, we grant the petition…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Demick v. HadiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bluntson v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API