Legal Opinion

Cook v. Borough of Manasquan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari. This writ was allowed to remove an ordinance of the borough of Manasquan introduced and passed to its first and second readings at a meeting of the council of that borough held June 32d, 1909, and passed on final reading July 13th, 1909, and on the same day approved by the mayor.

Read the full summary

On certiorari. This writ was allowed to remove an ordinance of the borough of Manasquan introduced and passed to its first and second readings at a meeting of the council of that borough held June 32d, 1909, and passed on final reading July 13th, 1909, and on the same day approved by the mayor. The ordinance recites that an application in writing was received by the council signed by at least ten resident freeholders oí the borough, for the widening of a certain portion of Main street, “so that said section be so widened that the roadbed of said section shall be thirty-six feet, and the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voorhees, J.

This case was heard by a single justice by consent under the statute.

The first objection made to the proceedings is that the petition presented to the council for the improvement, pursuant to the fifty-third section of the Borough act (Pamph. L. 1899, p. 171), prescribes that “every ordinance passed pursuant to the provisions of section thirty-three (33) shall be preceded by an application in writing for such improvement, describing the nature, kind and extent of the work or improvement desired, signed by at least ten (10) freeholders of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Andrews v. Inhabitants of BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. State ex rel. Hawkins v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  5. The People v. . ZeystNew York Court of Appeals · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. GilkisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. City of Los Angeles v. GlassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Slocum v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API