Legal Opinion

Causey v. Empire Plaid Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896Published

MotioN to REINSTATE appeal, dismissed for failure to,, print the judgment below as apart of the record.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, J.:

The appeal was dismissed for a failure on the part of the appellant to comply with Rule 28. The printing was done before the amendment, requiring the .judgment in all cases to be printed, was made the rule. Before the amendment, it would not have been necessary to print, as a part of the case on appeal, a judgment like the one in this case. The rule required the printing “ of so much and such parts of the record as may be necessary ’to a proper understanding of the exceptions and grounds ■of error assigned.” Upon the response of the jury that the plaintiff was not the owner and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiley v. Bessemer City Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API