Legal Opinion

Mark IX, Inc. v. Surette

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1986No. BK-236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

492 So.2d 745 (1986)

MARK IX, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant,

v.

Elizabeth M. SURETTE, Appellee.

No. BK-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 31, 1986.

Rehearing Denied August 27, 1986.

Kenneth R. Ridlehoover, Pensacola, for appellant.

Matt E. Dannheisser, of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a partial final judgment which quieted title to a certain section of real property in Surette, based on the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence. Mark IX contends the evidence at bar is insufficient to meet the requirements of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaw v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Holley v. MaySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. McDonald v. O'SteenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. DeRoche v. WinskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDonald v. GivensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Shultz v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Baker v. NiessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Renedo v. EganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API