Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Goldwyn Distributing Corp. v. Gehrz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
A query is made whether the petitioner has resorted to the proper procedu're.
That a writ of prohibition under the general and supervisory jurisdiction of this court is the appropriate method for this court to control the actions of a lower court which has assumed or threatens to assume jurisdiction over a party or of a cause when, as a matter of law, there is a want of such jurisdiction, has been so recently treated that it needs no further discussion. State ex rel. Bergougnan Rubber Corp. v. Gregory, 179 Wis. 98, 190 N. W. 918; State ex rel. Peterson v. Circuit Court, 177 Wis. 548, 556, 188…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. EggenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kenney v. Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal Order of MooseSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Pabst v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Schultz v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- State Ex Rel. St. Michael's Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- State ex rel. Ætna Insurance v. FowlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.