Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dolenty v. Reece

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1911No. 3,004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original application for mandamus by the state, on the relation of W. B. Dolenty, against Frank L. Reece, clerk of the district court of the first judicial district, to compel the entry of a judgment. In behalf of Respondent, there was a brief by Messrs. McIntyre & McIntyre. Oral argument by Mr. H. &. McIntyre.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The district court of Lewis and Clark county, on February 17, 1909, in the case of Dolenty v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Company, entered a judgment for the defendant; on appeal to this court, the judgment was reversed, and the following order entered: “Since there is not any dispute as to the facts of this case, a new trial is not necessary; but the cause is remanded to the district court, with directions to set aside its findings and judgment, and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,821.93 and costs.” (Dolenty v. Rocky Mountain Bell Tel. Co., 41 Mont. 105, 108 Pac. 921.) This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimpton v. Jubilee Placer Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dolenty v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodward v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gallatin Valley Electric Ry. v. NeibleMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lasby v. BurgessMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hansen v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API