Legal Opinion

Hatton v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 1, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Ron. Leo. 8. Rassieur, Judge. (1) To effect a statutory dedication, the requirements of the statute must be complied with. Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600. (2) It is essential to every valid dedication at common law that it should conclude the owner, and that, as against the public, it should be accepted by tbe proper local authorities or by general public user.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Ron. Leo. 8. Rassieur, Judge. (1) To effect a statutory dedication, the requirements of the statute must be complied with. Putnam v. Walker, 37 Mo. 600. (2) It is essential to every valid dedication at common law that it should conclude the owner, and that, as against the public, it should be accepted by tbe proper local authorities or by general public user. Elliott on Roads and Streets (3 Ed.),, sec. 122; Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. 13; Landis v. Hamilton, 77 Mo. 554; St. Louis v. St. Louis University, 88 Mo. 155; Baker v. Vanderburg, 99 Mo.…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

I

BOND, J.

_ .. .. . street.

(After stating the facts as above.) — The pleadings and proof in this case require an application of the law governing the right of a city to acquire streets and alleys by a statutory and a non-statutory dedication and of the rule relating to the effect upon such titles of adverse possession for the period of ten: years.

The dedication of so much of his estate as was. shown on the properly executed, acknowledged and recorded plat made by George Buchanan in his lifetime was in strict statutory form and vested title to the streets and alleys therein designated,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buschmann v. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Grading Independence & Westport Road v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Elsea v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of LankfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Johnson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API