Rodriguez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtSherry Radack, Chief Justice
A jury convicted appellant, Abel Diaz Rodriguez, of three charges of sexual assault of a child, a person he was "prohibited from marrying,"1 and assessed punishment at confinement for life and a $10,000 fine on each charge, which the trial court ordered to run consecutively. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant contends that "[t]he evidence is insufficient to trigger the statutory enhancement provision under [ Penal Code section 22.011(f) ] because there was no evidence that Appellant was engaged in a bigamous relationship admitted at trial." We affirm.
BACKGROUND
There is no need to detail…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Arteaga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Moore, Jammie LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Liverman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lopez, Rito Gregory Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020
- Rodriguez, Abel DiazCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020
- Senn, Michael RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020