Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 2018No. NOS. 01-17-00906-CR; 01-17-00907-CR; 01-17-00908-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherry Radack, Chief Justice

A jury convicted appellant, Abel Diaz Rodriguez, of three charges of sexual assault of a child, a person he was "prohibited from marrying,"1 and assessed punishment at confinement for life and a $10,000 fine on each charge, which the trial court ordered to run consecutively. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant contends that "[t]he evidence is insufficient to trigger the statutory enhancement provision under [ Penal Code section 22.011(f) ] because there was no evidence that Appellant was engaged in a bigamous relationship admitted at trial." We affirm.

BACKGROUND

There is no need to detail…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Arteaga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Moore, Jammie LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Liverman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lopez, Rito Gregory Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020
  2. Rodriguez, Abel DiazCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020
  3. Senn, Michael RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API