Legal Opinion

In re Doo Woon

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

On December 11, 1883, a writ of habeas corpus was allowed by me, directed to William H. Watkinds, chief of police of Portland, and returnable before this court on the following day, commanding him then and there to produce the body of Doo Woon, together with the time and cause of his caption and imprisonment. The writ was allowed on the petition of one Do Ki, alleging that Doo Woon is a subject of the Chinese empire, and a resident of this state; that he was then imprisoned in the jail of Portland by said chief of police, “by reason of a warrant issued by the governor of Oregon, for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Ex parte SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1843
  3. Ex parte ThorntonTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex parte HartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1894
  2. People Ex Rel. Hackler v. LohmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re HaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. Ex parte DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  5. In re BlochDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API