Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Cowles

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 26, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Judge:

This case requires an interpretation of certain sections of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act, KRS 304.39-010 — 304.39-340. The facts are not in dispute. The issue is whether one who is a passenger in an uninsured automobile, but who does not own, operate or maintain a motor vehicle in this state, is barred by KRS 304.39-060 from asserting tort liability for injuries received in an automobile accident. The trial court held the action is barred. We reverse.

It is undisputed that appellant, while riding as a passenger in an automobile operated by her husband, was injured as a result…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fann v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. RisenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  2. Probus v. SirlesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  3. Atchison v. OvercastCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
  4. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  5. Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. RisenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API