JARRARD v. Wildes
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
Neither the application for the processioning of an alleged disputed land line nor the protest thereto make a case “respecting title to land,” nor does the case otherwise come within the jurisdiction of this court, and, accordingly, it must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Code (Ann.), §§ 2-3704, 2-3708; Elkins v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 647 (92 S. E. 51); Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 S. E. 626); Edenfield v. Lanier, 203 Ga. 348 (46 S. E. 2d, 582); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 (57 S. E. 2d, 77).
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
All the Justices concur,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elkins v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Ledford v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Pearre v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Edenfield v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Graham v. TallentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Sanders v. CallowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Fulford v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953