Legal Opinion

Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Norwest Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 31, 1997No. Record 970385PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

In this appeal of right, we focus upon the meaning of “insurance” in the context of the regulatory jurisdiction of the State Corporation Commission and its Bureau of Insurance. The term is not defined in the Code of Virginia, but we have said that a “shifting of the risk is the essence of insurance.” Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Co. v. DePew, 247 Va. 240, 248, 440 S.E.2d 918, 923 (1994).

Here, we consider whether the Commission erred in ruling that it had no authority to regulate a product that is being offered to consumers in the title insurance market. Specifically, the dispositive question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilb, Rogal and Hamilton Co. v. DePewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  2. Ollendorff Watch Co. v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Swiss Re Life Co. America v. GrossSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Appalachian Voices v. STATE CORP. COM'NSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Va. Elec. & Power Co. v. State Corp. Comm'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  3. Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Christian v. STATE CORP. COM'NSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  5. Tanner v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API