Legal Opinion

Smith v. National Sash & Door Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1915No. 20,396PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

This case is before us on the motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal because it involves no doubtful question of law. But one vital question is presented — that of dependency — and as the matter has been fully briefed and argued on the motion it amounts to a final submission of the case on *817the merits and will be so considered, as the parties have so treated it.

The plaintiff recovered as being partly dependent on her son, Arthur Lake, who was killed while working in the' defendant’s glass plant. He was eighteen years old, illegitimate,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen of America v. ComeauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Johnson v. Grand Lodge of Ancient OrderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Geo. A. Lowe Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Glassco v. GlasscoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. Wade ex rel. Ireton v. Scherrer & Bennett Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. McGarvie v. Frontenac Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API