Legal Opinion

Pepin v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 30, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00042Unknown

1Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID PEPIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-42 v. Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., Defendant. ___________________________________/ OPINION Before the Court are various motions in limine filed by the parties in anticipation of trial. Motions in limine should address discrete evidentiary issues related to trial; they are not “procedural devices for the wholesale disposition of theories or defenses.” Dunn ex rel. Albery v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,

264 F.R.D. 266, 274

(E.D. Mich. 2009) (citation omitted). Accordingly, “[o]rders in limine…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry Gilmour v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Stone v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Richard E. Madore v. Ingram Tank Ships, Inc. v. Samson Ocean Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API