Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Colorado Division of Gaming

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1996No. 95CA1756PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

Plaintiff, Robert E. Purcell, appeals from an order of the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (the Commission) denying his petition for a declaratory order. We affirm.

In 1993, plaintiff petitioned the Colorado Division of Gaming (Division) and, ultimately, the Commission, for a determination whether a gaming device he sought to introduce, “21 Superbucks jackpot feature,” was permitted under the statutory definition of “blackjack” set forth in § 12-47.1-103(4), C.R.S. (1991 Repl.Vol. 5B). The 21 Superbucks jackpot feature involves a progressive jackpot coin *1204accep…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Purcell v. Colorado Division of GamingColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ainsworth v. Colorado Ltd. Gaming Control CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API