Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 2013No. 2D13-2368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The postconviction court’s denial of Antonio D. Brown’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice for Brown to file a motion under rule 3.801. If Brown chooses to file a rule 3.801 motion, it must comply with the requirements outlined in *826rules 3.801(b), (c), (e), and 3.850(n). Upon receipt of a rule 3.801 motion, the court must follow the procedure outlined in rule 3.850(f). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (effective July 1, 2013).

In its order, the postconviction court did not indicate whether Brown is entitled to credit for time spent in jail…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API