Legal Opinion

Spielmann v. Kliest

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs taken before a master.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The decision of this case turns on a question of notice.

Joseph Spiess, on the 3d day of November, 1855, granted and demised, by formal deed, to Charles Boese, and to his executors, administrators and assigns, a term of ten years from the 1st day of May, 1856, in a certain lot of land situate in the city of Hoboken. The rent reserved was $650. The lease provided that Spiess should purchase of Boese, at the end of the term, *200any and all buildings and erections of a permanent nature that Boese should, during the term, erect on the demised premises, at a valuation to be ascertained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James v. MoreyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  2. Johnson v. StaggNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  3. Broad & Market National Bank v. LarsenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Berry v. Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1817

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wittson v. Englewood Plumbing Supply Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. Mayhew v. ChapmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API