Legal Opinion
Harmon v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 9, 1964No. Civ. No. 63-37PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Presented for adjudication are the following questions:(1) The jurisdiction of the Court,(2) The rights, if any, of plaintiff, as assignee of the claims of certain union members for alleged breaches of a collective bargaining contract between defendant and their union,1 a labor organization within the meaning of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U. S.C. §§ 141-187).
The first claim for relief charges that the usual work hours of one Tabor, an employee of defendant, were from 8:00 o’clock A.M. to 4:30 P.M. and that on April 25, 1962, defendant requested Tabor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- International Brotherhood of Telephone Workers v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1965