Legal Opinion

Erie R. v. Cornell No. 20

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 8, 1947No. 80, Docket 20755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Determination of the facts of a lawsuit, when the witnesses disagree about them, always presents difficulties. As the facts necessarily occurred in the past, and not in the trial judge’s presence, he must undertake an historical reconstruction; and the wiser historians tell us that any such reconstruction is inherently guessy. For the likelihood is small that any mere mortal can acquire absolutely certain knowledge of bygone events. The probability is less that such knowledge will be approximated by upper-court judges, reading but a printed record, than by a trial judge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. The Anna O'BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Burns Bros. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Automobile Ins. v. Burns Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. The NewburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mentor Insurance Company v. BrannkasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. In re Panama Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Mentor Insurance v. BrannkasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. P. Dougherty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API