Weed v. Weed
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Writ of error from a judgment rendered by the superior court in Fairfield county, at its October term, 1853. The original action was assumpsit, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $745.85. The defendants filed a motion for a new trial, which was granted, unless the plaintiif should remit the sum of $117, improperly included in the verdict.
Read the full summary
Writ of error from a judgment rendered by the superior court in Fairfield county, at its October term, 1853. The original action was assumpsit, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $745.85. The defendants filed a motion for a new trial, which was granted, unless the plaintiif should remit the sum of $117, improperly included in the verdict. The motion stated that the plaintiff claimed to recover, among other items, the sum of $117 and interest thereon, from the 1st day of July, 1843, and that the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff, including therein the said sum of $’117, and…
1Opinion of the CourtStorrs, C. J.
This writ of error was brought upon the original record of the judgment rendered in the superior court. As that record has, since this writ of error was brought, in consequence of its not stating correctly the proceedings of that court, been amended and corrected by that court, so as to state those proceedings truly and formally, and a new record, on such correction, substituted, it is obvious that the latter is now the only subsisting record of the proceedings and judgment of the superior court in the case, and that the original record is annulled, and consequently, in contemplation of law,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Pascack Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Ritar Ford Sales, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1972
- Gibson v. Cincinnati EnquirerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1877
- Kohlsaat v. CrateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893