Legal Opinion
City of Boca Raton v. Tradewind Hills, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 12, 1968No. 1517PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCAIN, Judge.
Defendant, City of Boca Raton, appeals a final judgment holding its filling station spacing ordinance invalid as applied to certain property owned by plaintiffs.
City Ordinance No. 339 of the City of Boca Raton requires a minimum distance of seven hundred fifty (750) feet between filling stations. Plaintiff, Tradewind Hills, Inc., owns a parcel of land on U.S. Highway No. 1 in the defendant city and plaintiff, Texaco, Inc., is contract vendee for the property. Plaintiffs desire to utilize the land as a filling station site but their plans are frustrated because the property is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- City of Miami Beach v. LachmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- City of St. Petersburg v. AikinSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Burritt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Dallas Investment Co. v. PeaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Georgianna Hill Stone v. City of MaitlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Moviematic Industries Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- American Perfit Crystal Corp. v. Fumpston, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1969
- Moviematic Ind. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Toothaker v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County1972