Legal Opinion

McPherrin v. Hartford Fire Ins.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 14, 1940No. 72PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOHOE, District Judge.

The question now under consideration and for determination involves Rule 14 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, generally referred to as the rule pertaining to third party practice.

The admitted facts appearing from the pleadings or from oral agreements made upon a pre-trial hearing may be briefly stated as follows: The plaintiff shipped 1,002 head of lambs in four cars over the Western Pacific Railroad Company and the Union Pacific Railroad with destination Chicago, Illinois, and on the 3rd day of July, 1939, said shipment for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. JollimoreDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  2. Bluefield Sash & Door Co. v. Corte Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Delano v. IvesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Andromidas v. Theisen Bros.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1950
  5. United States v. De HavenDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API