Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1909Published

Motion for final Judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The issues were referred to a referee to

hear, try and determine. The case was tried and the referee reported in favor of the plaintiff, but no direction for the payment of costs is contained either in his report and findings or in the interlocutory judgment confirming such report and findings. The plaintiff now applies for final judgment in a form which contains a provision for the payment of costs. The referee had the discretion to allow or disallow costs. Since he did not award any, the court at Special Term has no power to do so. Sabater v. Sabater, 7 App. Div. 70. See Stevens v. Weiss, 25…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldner v. GoldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Stevens v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sabater v. SabaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API