Legal Opinion

Demarco v. Duplantis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1956No. 4251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

The very narrow question presented for our determination by this appeal is whether a co-owner can without joining his co-owners institute a possessory action against one allegedly disturbing his possession of a tract of land. Plaintiff co-owner appeals from judgment below sustaining an exception of no right of action and dismissing his suit.

Plaintiff alleged real and actual possession of a certain tract of. land for more than one year previous to an alleged disturbance of his possession by defendant, who allegedly erected a fence and cut some timber from this tract immediately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stinson v. MarstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. Ciaccio v. HartmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Loret v. FuglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Chef Menteur Land Co. v. MercierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. British American Oil Producing Company v. GrizzaffiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. BoudoinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Givens v. GivensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Dunham v. NixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Demarco v. DuplantisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API