Legal Opinion

Bear v. City of Allentown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1892No. Appeal, No. 94PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 94, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, Solomon Bear, from judgment of C. P. Lebigb Co., April T., 1888, No. 45, refusing to take off nonsuit. Trespass for damages to property.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 94, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, Solomon Bear, from judgment of C. P. Lebigb Co., April T., 1888, No. 45, refusing to take off nonsuit. Trespass for damages to property. The facts shown at the trial before Reeder, P. J., specially presiding, were as follows:' Plaintiff brought this common law action, under the provisions of article XVI, section 8, of the constitution, to recover damages occasioned by water backing up on the street in front of his premises, by reason of a sewer constructed by defendant being insufficient to carry it off. The water overflowed into the cellar of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam,

We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge below on the motion to strike off the compulsory nonsuit.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Metzgar v. Lycoming TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Lorah v. Amity TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Village of Willoughby v. MaloneOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Sullivan v. City of PittsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API