Legal Opinion

CURTIS Et v. STATE Ex LENGEL

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1929No. 984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The sole question is whether or not the court below erred in issuing the peremptory writ of mandamus upon the ground that the relator was removed from his office as Chief of Police by the Mayor without being given a reasonable time in which to make and file an explanation under Section 486-17a, General Code.

The contention of the relator is that he was not given a reasonable time in which tp make and file an explanation with the Mayor, and he relies upon the case of State ex rel Bay vs. Witter, 110 Ohio St., 216.

In the instant case the notice of removal contained no reference whatever to an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Bay v. WitterOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. AckermanOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. State, Ex Rel. Wirth v. SeccombeOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API