Crain v. State

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Brian K. Crain asks us to reverse his conviction of non-support of a dependent, *447claiming his waiver of counsel was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Because his claim must be raised in a post-conviction petition, we dismiss his appeal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On June 24, 2005, Crain was charged with non-support of a dependent. Crain hired private counsel. On April 26, 2006, defense counsel filed a motion to withdraw appearance. On May 3, 2006, the trial court held a hearing, confirmed Crain wanted to terminate the representation, and granted the motion. Crain told…