Legal Opinion

Reidinger v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Marquette. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

In the year 1857 the defendant, being-then the owner of lot two on block three of a plat made by said company in addition to the city of Marquette, conveyed the same to William J. Gordon and Peter White, “reserving therefrom all that part of said lot above described which is now used and occupied by said Cleveland Iron -Mining Company for railroad or railway purposes, to be used and occupied by the said Cleveland Iron Mining Company, its successors and assigns, so long as needed or desired by them for the right of way for *32said railroad or railway purposes.” Gordon subsequently conveyed his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. BiglyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Ives v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Willey v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Anderson v. BaughmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frank v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Salt Lake Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Elsea v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Reynolds v. GaertnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Weisenburger v. KirkwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API