Legal Opinion
Shoen v. Shoen
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 16, 1996No. CIV 90-1561 PHX BMV, CIV 91-2024 PHX BMVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
On April 27, 1995, this court delivered a Memorandum and Order denying the plaintiffs’ request to contact the jurors who deliberated in this case as to their understanding of the verdict forms provided by this court. 1 Since that time, the plaintiffs have made repeated attempts to convince this court to reverse its decision. On May 16, 1996, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a remand “for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to consider the proposed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.”…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Denise Bohus v. Stanley A. BeloffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. McDougalDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999
- Fressadi v. GloverDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020