Legal Opinion
Augustus v. Harvey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2002-2545PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Alma Augustus brought this action against the Secretary 1 of the United States Army alleging violations of the Administrative ■ Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq., the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. 2 The parties have each moved for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Because the Secretary failed to comply with the procedures prescribed in the Army’s regulations when responding to complaints Augustus filed, judgment will…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kearns v. Fed. Aviation Admin.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Beattie v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Augustus v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Augustus v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kearns v. Federal Aviation AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.