Legal Opinion

Hill v. Small

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 3, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff brought this action to recover an amount claimed to be due her upon the settlement of the accounts of a partnership between herself and the defendant under which she was to hatch eggs and both parties were to sell the chicks, the expenses and profits of the undertaking to be shared equally. The trial court rendered judgment that the defendant pay the plaintiff a certain amount found to be due her at the termination of the partnership, upon the basis that he had collected the price of certain chicks sold by him. The defendant has appealed. His sole claim is that the only evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Branford Trust Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Perrelli v. SavasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Meagher v. Colonial Homes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Davis v. GreensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. State v. VillafaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Fox v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API