Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Forbes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1858PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish of St. Landry, Martel, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

This action was instituted to recover of the defendant, a horse-drover from the State of Missouri, damages to the amount of one thousand dollars, which plaintiff alleges he suffered in the fraudulent sale of a horse to him, which, though warranted sound, was, at and prior to the time of the sale, diseased with the glanders.

The prescription of two months and also of one year, is plead by defendant. Article 2513 of the Code, amended by the statute of 1828, p. 160, $ 22, declares, that all suits for the redhibitory defects of animals, may be instituted within two months after the date of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bughman v. ByersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duer & Taylor v. BLANCHARD, WALKER, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Sims v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Johnson v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958
  4. Weiser v. ShwartzDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  5. Thomas v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API