Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. Ross
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing.
McMahan, J.
Appellee, in support of its petition for a rehearing, contends that the cases cited in the main opinion are not in point and throw little light on the questions involved in this appeal, since in none of them was the railroad obligated to renew the crossing, as was required by the contract in the instant case. It is true that in none of the contracts involved in the cases cited was the railroad required to renew the crossing and that all of them provided that the traction company should, at its own expense, maintain and renew the crossing. But in Union…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Traction Co. v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Fort Wayne & Northern Indiana Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1923