Legal Opinion

Russell Graham Kirkpatrick v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1958No. 17008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

This damage suit arises out of a collision that occurred at a railroad crossing between an automobile operated by the plaintiff, Kirkpatrick, and the defendant railroad company’s train. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The question presented on appeal is whether the district court erred in charging the jury under the Florida comparative negligence statute, F.S.A. § 768.06, 1 in the following manner:

“I instruct you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that the plaintiff, Russell Graham Kirkpatrick, was guilty of negligence as a matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. HadlockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Van Allen v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santiesteban v. McGrathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API