Legal Opinion

Davis v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1951No. 31465PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

An unlawful detainer action was dismissed by the trial court on the theory that the plaintiff had not sufficiently pursued his remedies in a prior action for specific performance between the parties. We, too, conclude that the unlawful detainer action should have been dismissed, for numerous and sundry additional reasons. .The trial court’s conclusion and ours can have meaning only against the background of the facts.

E. Burt Brockway and Richard L. Davis entered into an unacknowledged agreement April 29, 1946, whereby Brock-way agreed to erect a building on an eighteen-foot strip of land in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennington v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Du Bois v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Robertson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. StokesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Little v. CataniaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stevenson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API