Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Whitehall Manor, Inc. v. Planning Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 2013Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*739CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge McCULLOUGH.

I agree with the Majority that Whitehall Manor, Inc. and Linden 515, LP (Appellants) have standing to object to the decision of the City of Allentown Planning Commission (Commission) that granted conditional approval of the preliminary and final land development plans submitted by Allentown Commercial and Industrial Development Authority (Applicant). However, I respectfully dissent from the Majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s determination that the Commission did not err by simultaneously granting approval of Applicant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valenti v. Washington TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Shaw v. Township of Upper St. Clair Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API