Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case certified from the district court for Eenville county, Webber, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant was indicted for a fraudulent sale of -mortgaged property, contrary to the provisions of Gen. St. 1878, c. 39, § 14. The defendant having demurred to the indictment, and the demurrer having been overruled, the court below, with the consent of the defendant, certified the case to this court for its decision upon the ■questions of law involved.

*5381. We are of opinion that the indictment is not liable to the charge of duplicity. The allegation that the defendant did “sell and dispose of, to one P. W. Glenn, and divers other persons, the names and description of whom, or of any or…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. Union Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Chappell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Schuchard v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. State v. NiesmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API