Legal Opinion

Builders Supply Company of Hopewell, Inc. v. Piedmont Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 24, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Hopewell, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

These two cases, present precisely similar questions, and by stipulation of counsel have been argued together. The Piedmont Lumber Company, Inc., and the Peerless Lumber Company, Inc. (hereinafter called the plaintiffs), instituted separate actions against the Builders Supply Company of Hopewell, Inc. (hereinafter called the defendant), in the Corporation Court of Hopewell, Va., which resulted in separate judgments against the defendant.

*227• The question involved is whether or not the Corporation Court of the city of Hopewell had jurisdiction of the actions. It appears that, at the time the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Staunton Perpetual Building & Loan Co. v. HadenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Shenandoah V. R. R. v. Ashby's TrusteesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  3. Finney v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  4. Stotz v. Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  5. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Everhart's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crouch v. CrouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Big Seam Coal Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. National Trust for Historic Preservation v. 1750 K Investment PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1984
  4. White v. DavidsonArizona Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API