Legal Opinion

Bronger v. Office of Personnel Management

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 26, 1984No. Appeal Nos. 83-1349, 83-1350 and 83-1376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD S. SMITH, Circuit Judge.

In this consolidated appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board (board) petitioners, air traffic controllers each with civilian/military experience in their jobs exceeding 25 years, request reversal of board decisions sustaining, in each case, denial by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) of each of their requests for an immediate retirement annuity. We first address and reject OPM’s contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and then reverse the board’s decisions for the reason stated below.

Background

Each of these three petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roy L. Schapansky v. Department of Transportation, FaaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Ellis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Wayne Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Margaret A. Cheeseman v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. Les E. Templeton v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Avegene L. Simmons v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. Willard A. Bronger v. Office of Personnel Management, Frank E. Kacprowicz v. Office of Personnel Management, Albert J. Veverka v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API