Legal Opinion

Schubert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Carver county, Macdonald, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

The defendant’s railroad, where it ran through plaintiff’s land, had not been fenced, as required by Gen. St. 1878, c. 31, § o4. Section 55 of that chapter provides that • “all railroad companies shall be liable for domestic animals killed or injured by the negligence of such companies; and a failure to build and maintain cattle-guards and fences, as above (viz., in section 54,) provided, shall be deemed an act of negligence on the part of such companies.” Plaintiff turned his cow upon his land to graze, and to drink at a spring thereon, and, between 11 and 12 o’clock in the forenoon, having…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whittier v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Evans v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  3. Holtz v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API