Saginario v. Attorney General
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClifford, J.
I join fully in Part I of the Court’s opinion and in the affirmance of the Appellate Division judgment reached in Part II. I suggest, however, that the scope of the Court’s remedy— resubmission of the matter to arbitration with notice to and full participation by plaintiff — is contrary to the applicable provisions of the Employer-Employee Relations Act and the mechanics of the grievance procedure established by the collective negotiation agreement. More important, I believe that the wrong route has been taken to achieve that remedy. Rather than warp the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kearny PBA Local 21 v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.